Methodology (C08018)

 

Destinations of Leavers from Higher Education (DLHE) Collection 2008/09

Methodology

Version 1.1 Produced 2009-05-06

Table of contents

Who to contact


Arrangements for the 2008/09 DLHE survey

There are two census dates for each year. For the majority of students completing a programme in either autumn or summer the reference date will be six months after completion.

Students who complete their courses between 1 August and 31 December 2008 have a census date of 20 April 2009. Students who complete their courses between 1 January and 31 July 2009 have a census date of 11 January 2010.

Institutions should report firmly determined destinations in place at the reference dates.

Graduates should be surveyed in either April or January as appropriate: institutions are advised to maintain the discrete survey populations as responses from graduates surveyed at the wrong times will not be included in the response rates.

However it is recognised that for some students the final confirmation of award by exam boards may be several months after the student completes the course, such that the qualification obtained is not known in time for the student to be included in the April survey. Under these circumstances, and only these circumstances, institutions should survey these leavers in January but must ensure that such students are surveyed using the questionnaire that corresponds to the April census, in order to capture the leaver’s activity at the appropriate time after completion of their course. The APRJAN flag must be set to April to reflect this. Institutions will need to contact HESA to confirm these arrangements.

Note that despite there being two data capture reference dates, there is only one data collection, the return date for which is 31 March 2010.

DLHE April pre-survey preparation

Centrally-hosted online DLHE questionnaire

HESA offers a web-based DLHE questionnaire, which is centrally-hosted by HESA. If an institution wishes to present this method of taking part in the DLHE survey to its graduates, then it will need to have completed the registration exercise prior to the data capture period. Details about how to register are available at Centrally-hosted online DLHE survey - Guidance notes.

Postal mailing questionnaires and telephone scripts

Prior to each DLHE survey the HESA Institutional Liaison team will email all DLHE contacts with a set of questions about the size of their institution's DLHE target population and the mailing/telephone arrangements that they plan to use. Also, as part of this email, the Institutional Liaison team will ask for the name and address of two people at the institution to whom the DLHE questionnaires and telephone scripts should be addressed. This may or may not be the DLHE contact; someone else, e.g. a member of the Careers Service, may actually manage the DLHE survey, and so the consignment should be sent to them.

Not supplying responses to these questions will adversely affect the smooth running of the DLHE process. If an institution does not provide addressee details, for each survey, the distributor will either deliver to the address HESA provide (this will be of the last known DLHE contact as stored on the HESA system) or take the consignment back to the depot. Both situations can cause delays, which impact on the time institutions have to prepare for mailing. This also poses unnecessary administrative burdens on the printers, on HESA and on institutions, in trying to trace a missing consignment and/or arrange for re-delivery.

It is important that contacts in institutions inform their colleagues, e.g. security staff (or anyone else who may be likely to be in receipt of the delivery) that delivery of questionnaires and telephone scripts is expected. Institutional Liaison will email DLHE contacts close to the delivery date to inform them between which dates delivery can be expected (this will usually be no longer than during a period of five working days). If boxes of questionnaires and telephone scripts are accurately addressed, and institutions expect the delivery, consignments should be received within this stated delivery period.

HESA therefore ask that institutions provide the name, job title, exact mail address and the telephone number of two recipients at the institution; one principal and one back up. The distributor will attempt delivery to the first recipient, and if unsuccessful, a second delivery attempt can be made to the back up recipient.

If an institution's DLHE survey is administered by another institution/organisation, and the questionnaires and telephone scripts need to be delivered there, please provide the full mail address of this institution/organisation. In such cases the address label will include both a named 'care-of' contact and the address of the institution/organisation where the survey is administered and also the name of the institutional contact for reference. The back up contact details given should also be someone from the administering institution/organisation, so that a second attempt at delivery can be made.

The consignment will be clearly labelled - indicating the total number of boxes making up the delivery, and also the contents of each box, e.g. 1000 English questionnaires. It is important that an institution checks the consignment on delivery, as shortfalls cannot be rectified later.

HESA stock only a very small number of questionnaires and telephone scripts as contingency. This would be sufficient to provide to an institution in the event of a minor and unforeseen circumstance, should part of their own stock become unsuitable for mailing, e.g. if mailing equipment malfunctions and questionnaires are lost as a consequence. HESA does not store sufficient numbers to replace part of or an entire single institution's consignment. It is therefore imperative that institutions check the POPDLHE estimates provided by HESA and either; confirm that these are correct, or provide accurate revised estimates. The figures provided are used by the printer to determine the final extent of the print run of questionnaires and telephone scripts for all institutions.

April target list system (E08051)

HESA provides an on-line system that helps institutions identify those students to be included in the April survey. More information is available from the DLHE 2008/09 collection page.

DLHE April survey - census date of 20 April 2009

Use an Agency?

Most institutions mail out the survey in-house which accounts for a significant proportion of staff time in two concentrated periods during the year.

There are now commercial and sector-based agencies available that have extensive systems in place that will do all the DLHE work. They do so professionally and confidentially. However there is a lead time and it is necessary to be well organised if you are using an agency.

Specifically you need to:

  • Decide whether the agency is doing the whole end to end process or doing specific activities.
  • Have data on contact information in agreed formats (you have some say) at an agreed time.
  • Agree to interact with the agency using named personnel. A single point of contact is likely to be contacted to be told that a given area had a poor set of telephone data etc. The agency will not interact with your departments.
  • Be prepared to say stop once a given rate has been achieved: agencies can go on unnecessarily, especially if rewarded.
  • Take the output in an agreed format.
  • Where an agency is used it is also advisable for a DLHE officer at the institution to maintain a ‘quality assurance role’, especially where the agency is used for coding returns. One way to ensure quality is for random samples of the coded returns to be checked against the original returned DLHE survey form and any coding checked by the DLHE officer responsible for the HESA return at your institution.

Agencies seem to do at least as well as institutions in general but inevitably some control is relinquished.

Agencies can be used for some specific tasks only:

  • Post out ( some or all)
  • Telephoning
  • Web
  • Form processing
  • Keying

Using an agency to post surveys does not have an effect on the response rate. Less clear is the effect of using an agency for telephoning, but the better agencies train their staff well and can develop a style that matches that of an in house operation.

Initial contact

In the period 20 April 2009 to 11 May 2009 the only acceptable method of data capture is the standard questionnaire and it should be completed by the graduate only. Institutions are required to make initial contact with their graduates in the April POPDLHE between 20 April 2009 and 11 May 2009. Institutions should not be undertaking any destinations surveying prior to this 'Initial contact' period.

The standard questionnaire is available in the following formats:

Printed version: DLHE record contacts are contacted in January and asked to confirm HESA’s estimate of their institution’s 2008/09 POPDLHE with a DATELEFT between 1 August 2008 and 31 December 2008. The paper questionnaire is available in an A3 flat sheet, or folded into A4 or A5. It has space for institutions to overprint names and addresses or attach labels. Paper copies of the questionnaire will be delivered to institutions during March 2009.

HTML version: An HTML version of the questionnaire is available for institutions to host on their own websites. The HTML version is available in English and Welsh and can be downloaded from the DLHE 2008/09 collection page. Institutions should not add any questions to or change the questionnaire in any way. Institutions are responsible for programming any ‘back-end’ or database structures that are required to support the use of this version of the questionnaire. Graduates should be directed to the web reference for this locally-hosted online questionnaire using the email or covering letter texts provided by HESA. Leavers should complete, date and return this version of the questionnaire on the institution’s web site.

Centrally-hosted online DLHE version: The centrally-hosted online DLHE questionnaire is available at dlhe.hesa.ac.uk. Graduates should be directed to this web-reference in the email or covering letter and, once completed, the graduate should follow the instructions and submit their questionnaire.

PDF version: A PDF version of the questionnaire is available in both English and Welsh and can be downloaded from the DLHE 2008/09 collection page. Institutions can email this version of the questionnaire to graduates for completion. Leavers should print the form in order to complete, sign, date and return it to their institution.

As there are many ways a leaver can complete and return a questionnaire, it is possible that an institution may receive more than one questionnaire for the same individual. In this case the institution should return to HESA the first information it receives.

Initial contact schedule

During the first week of the 'Initial contact' period it is recommended institutions email a link to the centrally-hosted online questionnaire or their locally-hosted online questionnaire to those graduates for whom a valid and up to date email address is available. A postal questionnaire should then be sent to all those who did not complete and submit an online version, and to all those for whom an email address was not available. To allow as much time as possible for graduates to complete an online version, and therefore reduce the number of postal mailings, it is recommended the postal questionnaires be sent out towards the end of the second week. All graduates in the April POPDLHE must have been contacted by the end of the 'Initial contact' period.

If institutions are not offering either of the online versions, then postal mailing could take place any time during the 'Initial contact' period.

If a leaver returns the questionnaire without completing one or more of the core questions they can be contacted by the institution in order to try and obtain the missing information and so ensure a valid return.

HESA encourages institutions to make use of the centrally-hosted online questionnaire, and it hopes over time use of this version will increase.

Covering letters / emails

HESA has produced the text of the covering letters and emails that should accompany all versions of the questionnaire. They are available in both English and Welsh. HESA also provides instructions on how to use these texts and institutions should refer to this guidance. The letter and email texts are available in both English and Welsh. The covering letter text should be printed onto institutions' own letter headed stationery and this should be sent with all postal questionnaires. The text for email contact should be used for sending a link to either the centrally-hosted version or a locally-hosted version of the questionnaire. All letter and email texts with instructions for their use can be downloaded from the DLHE 2008/09 collection page.

The text of the letters and emails should NOT be changed apart from where it is indicated either in italics or where there is an instruction. Institutions should particularly note the instruction to insert their own data protection collection notice (See Data Protection and Collection Notices section below).

Institutions can add to the introductory text in order to address particular groups of students. For example, for students who have continued to study at the institution the following text may be used:

  • We are asking everyone, even those who have continued to study at the institution, what they will be doing on 20 April 2009, so that the information is comparable.

When sending out postal questionnaires institutions should mail out the questionnaire, letter, and, if they use them, a reply-paid envelope. In order to offset some of the additional costs that are incurred in implementing the survey, institutions can, if they wish, find sponsorship for the survey. Statutory users and their auditors are also content that institutions should be able to include other items in the survey mailing, for example, leaflets about institutions’ graduate services. It is acceptable for institutions to include other surveys in with the DLHE questionnaire. However in deciding what might be reasonable to include in the mailing, institutions will need to be conscious of the requirement to obtain the best possible response to the survey and to meet the response rate targets.

Similarly, the text for the email should be sent with a web reference to either the centrally-hosted online questionnaire or a locally-hosted version of the questionnaire. Institutions can include web references, e.g. to their own graduate services, or to other surveys, again bearing in mind the requirement to obtain the best possible response to the DLHE survey.

Direct contact with the leaver between 20 April 2009 and 11 May 2009

If the institution has direct contact with the leaver between 20 April 2009 and 11 May 2009 e.g. they visit the careers office, the leaver can be handed a standard questionnaire to complete whilst they are there. A copy of the covering letter must be handed out with the questionnaire.

If an institution's graduation ceremony falls during this period then graduates can be handed a questionnaire at graduation. Between 20 April 2009 and 11 May 2009 the standard questionnaire along with a copy of the covering letter must be used.

Postcard reminder in place of second mailing

Consider using a postcard as a reminder method in place of a second mailing. If you only use one postal mailing or emailing and then move to the telephone it may prove cost-effective to send a postcard to the graduate reminding them to complete the DLHE survey, whilst also providing the web reference for the online survey.

  • Postcards to the permanent address of the graduate may be read by the graduates’ families who could influence the graduate to complete the survey. The postcard can be effective in reaching those graduates you would not necessarily contact through the main postal method. During the trials for the National Student Survey it was discovered that a postcard sent to the permanent home address prompted the family of graduates to get in touch and update contact details or to act as a forwarding service for the original survey.
  • The postcard can be designed with your institution's logo and typeface etc. to be instantly recognisable by the graduate.
  • Keep the wording on the postcard to a minimum. It should include a prompt for the graduate to complete the postal survey, a link to an online version (if appropriate), and an email address and contact telephone number of the office dealing with the DLHE survey.
  • When using the postcard as a reminder method for the first time you might want to consider sending the postcard to a random sample of 50% of non-responders and use the second mailing, or one of the other methods of follow-up contact for the other 50%. The results of the returns from this can then be monitored to assess which method is more effective with your graduates.
  • Your department may experience an increase in telephone queries from the parents or family of graduates immediately following the posting of the postcard. It may be beneficial to have one dedicated email address that graduates and their representatives can contact during this time to allow communications to be more effectively managed.

Follow-up contact

Follow-up contact can be made between 11 May 2009 and 29 June 2009. Emailing a web reference or sending out a postal questionnaire for a second time is optional, as institutions may find other methods generate a better response, e.g. institutions may find that the practice of one postal mailing together with telephone follow-up is the best way for them to meet the response rate targets. If an institution intends to conduct a second postal mailing then it will have needed to inform HESA of its intention to do so at the pre-survey preparation stage of the survey. Again, the texts for covering letters and emails for follow-up contact are available in English and Welsh. Possible alternative follow-up methods are:

  • Send reminder postcards (which have been designed and printed locally to reflect the institution’s own branding).
  • Send an SMS text message to graduates to remind them (if the institution believes that this is appropriate).
  • Email graduates with a reminder.

Each time a questionnaire is sent, either by post or electronically, it must be accompanied by the the information contained in the covering letter or email.

Direct contact with the leaver between 11 May 2009 and 29 June 2009

If an institution has direct contact with the leaver between 11 May 2009 and 29 June 2009, e.g. they visit the careers office, the leaver can be interviewed using the telephone script or handed the printed version of the questionnaire to complete whilst they are there. A copy of the covering letter must be handed out with the questionnaire

If an institution's graduation ceremony takes place between 11 May 2009 and 29 June 2009 then it can interview graduates using the telephone script, or hand out a standard questionnaire. Institutions must convey the information contained in the covering letter prior to any interview using the telephone script, or hand out copies of the covering letter with any printed standard questionnaire.

Telephone survey follow-up

Any telephone follow-up must be conducted during the period 11 May 2009 to 29 June 2009. As institutions are required to undertake initial contact using the standard questionnaire, it is not possible to only conduct a telephone survey, which features a reduced set of questions.

Copies of the telephone script together with postal questionnaires are delivered to institutions during March 2009 and so institutions should inform HESA (as part of the pre-survey preparation) of their intention to conduct telephone follow-up. If an institution finds it is short of telephone scripts, photocopying of the DLHE telephone script is permissable with the consent of the copyright owner (HESA), provided the forms are used for DLHE purposes only.

Where a telephone call is made the caller needs to explain by way of introduction that:

  • They are ringing on behalf of the institution to find out whether the former student has found employment and/or further study following completion of their course.
  • Information is used both to advise current students about opportunities and also to feed into a national statistical survey conducted each year to see what happens to students upon leaving higher education.
  • The information on this form will be used by your institution and coded information will be sent to the Higher Education Statistics Agency. Further details and contact information are supplied as part of the covering letter.
  • They may be contacted again in the future as part of a follow-up survey. This survey will be conducted by a third party and so their details may be passed on to this third party.
  • They need to find out what the former student was doing on 20 April 2009.

Employing current students to undertake the telephoning

Institutions may wish to employ their own current students to undertake the telephoning as it establishes a link between present and former students and this may encourage participation in the telephone survey. Some institutions have reported using native speakers (for example Greek students to telephone Greek graduates) to help with non-UK calls.

Where a telephone call is made, obtaining the response directly from the leaver is desirable; if contact is made with someone other than the leaver, this is acceptable, provided that the contact is sufficiently well informed to be able to answer the core questions, which are indicated by a ring around the number on the telephone script. It is not so much the source of information that is important as the quality of the information itself. However, care must be taken when obtaining information from such third parties (see Data Protection and Collection Notices section below).

In determining whether or not information is robust enough for inclusion in the 2008/09 DLHE return, the contact must be able to:

  • Supply all the relevant information (i.e. answers to the core questions ringed on the telephone script) AND
  • Must be confident that it relates to the leaver’s position on 20 April 2009.

Where information for completion of the core questions on the telephone script comes from a source other than the leaver or a contact at the leaver’s home, then additional audit proof is required to show that the individual conducting the survey has collected or confirmed their source of data after 11 May 2009. For example, a confirmatory signature against the date that each individual student’s details were confirmed, since a standard questionnaire completed by the leaver is the only acceptable method of data capture prior to 11 May 2009.

Survey accessibility

Graduates with visual impairments or other disabilities that may restrict them from completing the paper questionnaire or an online version can complete the survey by way of telephone interview, or by using the PDF version of the questionnaire. The telephone interviewer can use the questionnaire instead of the telephone script to enable the graduate to answer all the questions, and not just the reduced set of questions on the telephone script. Alternatively, a graduate can print the PDF version of the questionnaire as a large print version or in a way that suits their requirements in order to complete, sign, date and return it to the institution. The PDF version of the questionnaire can be downloaded from the DLHE 2008/09 collection page.

Additional/sponsored questions

Institutions’ own or sponsored questions can be used with the telephone script but institutions will need to be conscious of the requirement to obtain the best possible response to the survey and to meet the response rate targets. The sponsored questions should perhaps be asked at the end of the telephone call, after institutions have ensured they have obtained sufficient information (at least all of the core questions answered) to provide a valid DLHE return.

Other informed source

Information obtained from other informed sources, including academic departments or employers, is also acceptable as a method of data capture. However the contact must be able to:

  • Supply all the relevant information (i.e. answers to the core questions ringed on the telephone script) AND
  • Must be confident that it relates to the leaver’s position on 20 April 2009.

The individual conducting the survey must be able to provide additional audit proof to show that they have collected or confirmed their source data after 11 May 2009. For example, a confirmatory signature against the date that each individual student’s details were confirmed, since a standard questionnaire completed by the leaver is the only acceptable method of data capture prior to 11 May 2009.

In the case of medical graduates only, if an institution has attempted to contact a graduate during the 'Initial contact' period, and has attempted to contact the graduate again, e.g. by telephone, but has had no response from either method, then the institution can use information obtained from the Medical School in order to complete a DLHE Record. Note that the data held by the Medical School must reflect the position of the graduate as at 20 April 2009. Medical graduates whose data is completed by using information obtained from the Medical School should be coded 7 'Other' in Field 4 Method and 3 'Not in study' in Field 6 Study (relating to Q2). Institutions should ensure that they have a clear audit trail for the information recorded.

Note that the core questions require that the contact will know what the leaver is doing with respect to both employment and further study on 20 April 2009.

Explicit refusals

An explicit refusal is where a leaver either sends back the questionnaire marking it as a refusal, emails, or writes a letter including a statement that they do not wish to be included in the survey. It can result from a telephone conversation where the leaver verbally states that they do not wish to be included in the survey. A leaver who does not send back the questionnaire and/or does not submit an electronic version and/or is un-contactable by telephone should not have a DLHE record returned to HESA, and is not regarded as having explicitly refused. Leavers with DLHE records identified as METHOD = 9 ‘Reply received explicitly refusing to provide information’ will be counted towards an institution’s response rate.

Longitudinal follow-up

An explicit refusal at the early DLHE stage automatically means the graduate will not be included in the sample selection for the relevant longitudinal follow-up. Institutions should however establish a central record for any graduate who indicates in Section F of the DLHE questionnaire that they do not wish to be contacted in the future as part of a follow-up survey. Also as a graduate can contact the institution at any point between the early DLHE and the longitudinal follow-up three years later to indicate they do not want to be further involved in DLHE, this record should be accessible to a number of institutional colleagues in Alumni, Careers Service etc., as there will be more than one institutional point that a graduate may contact. This information will then be readily available for institutions to refer to when the sample selection is drawn, and these graduates can be excluded.

Improving and maintaining a good response rate

Institutions are reminded of the target response rates for the DLHE survey, namely:

80% for UK-domiciled (i.e. home) leavers who previously studied full-time;
70% for UK-domiciled leavers who studied part-time;
50% for all other EU students;
80% for Research Council funded students.

All institutions are expected to meet, or exceed, these thresholds for the 2008/09 survey. The funding bodies have indicated that they are very concerned that some institutions are consistently falling significantly below this requirement.

 

Monitoring response rates

Each institution faces different challenges when trying to meet the HESA response rate. Every cohort of graduates is different and the methodology may have to be fine-tuned at your institution in order to achieve the best possible response to the survey. Monitoring response rates throughout the fieldwork period and to each type of response (post, electronic, telephone etc.) can help in deciding how to proceed with the following fieldwork period and may help in attaining a better response rate. By monitoring response carefully, any change to the response rate can be investigated and remedial action taken in a timely manner to mitigate any drop in response rate . If response rates have declined or the HESA target has not been met institutions should investigate what steps can be taken to rectify this prior to the end of the fieldwork period, for example, by additional phone contact. Following the fieldwork period some reflection of the DLHE process should take place, with weaknesses assessed and rectified before the next fieldwork period. If the return is closed as soon as the HESA target has been met but the population has not been exhausted consider keeping the fieldwork open. A high response rate will be a benefit to your institution in the long term; for example a high response rate will see more data available on the TQI website which will be viewed by prospective students.

Contact details

One of the most effective ways of increasing your response rate is to ensure the contact details you have for graduates are up to date and accurate.

  • Updating contact details of graduates in their final term will be an effective way of increasing the response to the DLHE. This may not be a task for the DLHE manager but for the institution's central administration. However the request for action may have to come from the DLHE manager and in some instances the Alumni Office.
  • Before the first mailing, if contact details are not maintained centrally you could ask individual departments to check the contact details and update them where necessary, including any known changes to email addresses and mobile telephone numbers.

Promotion of DLHE

  • Promotional material for the DLHE could be prominently displayed around the institution in areas used by final year students to raise awareness of the survey and show results of previous surveys for the students.
  • Maintaining contact with the graduate once they have left the institution through mailouts from the Careers Service can also result in graduate contact details remaining up to date. Some institutions write to graduates a few months after graduation reminding them of the benefits of contacting the Careers Service and alerting them to the DLHE and the importance of returning it.
  • The Careers Service in institutions can also extend their promotional activities by emailing graduates to remind them of their services and at the same time asking for any change of contact details to be mailed back to their alumni.
  • Some institutions also have staff working at graduation ceremonies who distribute information about the DLHE survey, raising awareness among graduates and guests that the survey will be sent to their home address. Staff have also reported that this is a good opportunity to remind graduates that they can still contact the university career service for advice.

Sharing good practice

Maintaining good communication within the whole of the institution is very helpful in obtaining a good response rate. Particularly important is the maintenance of up to date contact details which are often held in departments rather than by the central administration.

  • Where contact details are not held centrally or where the departments have supplementary records, the DLHE survey manager should consider requesting that each department and the Alumni Office, where appropriate, checks the DLHE sample before the fieldwork period commences.
  • Retaining email addresses following graduation allows quick and cost effective communication with graduates to be maintained. In the case of the DLHE survey, an email from the Careers Service alerting the graduate to the survey can also serve to remind the graduate of the services provided by the institution in the months following graduation.
  • Sharing the results of the DLHE with colleagues from around the institution will help to reinforce the importance of the information provided by the graduates. This in turn may lead to individual departments' commitment to collecting updated contact details during the students’ final term or semester.
  • Sharing experiences with colleagues from other institutions will enable good practice to be shared. There may also be scope for sharing the costs of outsourcing the postal or telephone survey.

Debriefing

Once the fieldwork period has closed and the return made to HESA allow some time for the DLHE team to reflect on the process.

  • Analyse the data; is one faculty achieving a lower response rate than others? Is there a reason for this?
  • How efficient was the postal survey; is there anything you or your staff would like to see changed?
  • How did the telephone survey work? Has anything changed since the last DLHE? Are fewer graduates available on land lines for example? Is there any feedback the student telephonists would like to provide?
  • Is it time to change part of your collection methodology, for example using the postcard reminder? How are you going to prepare for this change?
  • How did coding using the CASCOT system work for your institution?
  • Is there anything you need to feed back to HESA for wider consideration?
  • The DLHE results can be used within your institution for quality enhancement purposes; for example, which graduates are not getting graduate level jobs, how does this compare with your competitors?
  • Follow-up interviews should be considered with those graduates who have provided surprising results.
  • Can the DLHE data be used alongside the National Student Survey Data and your own internal surveys?

Audit trail, record keeping and monitoring

All data capture methods used must result in a robust audit trail. This will consist of one of the following:

Standard questionnaire (printed and PDF versions): evidence comprising the completed questionnaire, signed and dated by the leaver himself or herself.

Standard questionnaire (locally-hosted version): evidence demonstrating that the questionnaire was completed and dated by the leaver. This might for example mean that the institution’s system is set up in such a way that a read-only copy of the data keyed by the leaver is retained.

Standard questionnaire (centrally-hosted version): institutions should keep a copy of the files downloaded from the HESA archive.

Telephone survey: evidence comprising a completed telephone script, which was completed between 11 May 2009 and 29 June 2009. Where information for completion of the core questions on the telephone script comes from a source other than the leaver or a contact at the leaver’s home, then additional audit proof is required to show that the individual conducting the survey has collected or confirmed their source data after 11 May 2009. For example, a confirmatory signature against the date that each individual leaver’s details were confirmed, since a standard questionnaire completed by the leaver is the only acceptable method of data capture prior to 11 May 2009.

Other informed source: procedural evidence to demonstrate that the data

  • Answers the core questions ringed on the telephone script AND
  • Relates to the leaver’s position on 20 April 2009.

The individual conducting the survey must be able to provide additional audit proof to show that they have collected or confirmed their source data after 11 May 2009. For example, a confirmatory signature against the date that each individual leaver’s details were confirmed, since a standard questionnaire completed by the leaver is the only acceptable method of data capture prior to 11 May 2009.

Previous audits of FDS undertaken by HEFCE have not revealed any significant issues relating to institutions' systems and practices in this area. Therefore, it is not intended that there be a regular programme of audits in the near future. However, funding councils retain the right to resume audit, or undertake one off audits should issues or concerns arise.

Database

At the heart of any operation such as this is a database that is effective. It is likely to be based on databases already in use but needs to support a standard query language and to be designed flexibly so as to cope as the DLHE evolves.

  • It needs to be accessible from all the types of entry and to have good status facilities so that users can quickly review the position of a graduate. Good summary facilities are also needed. However MS Access as the engine can be suited to the task provided the design is good. It may be worth collaborating here.
  • The system is a dynamic one and so it is important to take frequent archives with the possibility of roll back. A lot of very standard computer science applies and will be known by the technically competent within the institution administration.

Internal record keeping

Databases have been discussed above. However, it is worth noting the following:

  • It needs to be seen that records are well maintained for the whole process. For some this means maintaining paper records and keeping the original DLHE surveys, others have developed electronic methods of record maintenance including scanning completed forms.
  • The introduction of CASCOT has allowed institutions to code employment data faster and more consistently than before. Good practice in the use of CASCOT should be shared with colleagues and fed back to the HESA Institutional Liaison team.

Form readers

The DLHE form is machine-readable and has been designed to be read by any sensible OCR system (hardware and software).

  • With most common systems it will be necessary to cut the form in half but this can be done quite insensitively and the system should still work.
  • The volumes of forms are quite low for an agency who will have more powerful software that reads and corrects faster. Thus as a stand alone job it is unlikely to make sense but would be good for an agency doing the rest of the work.
  • Developing the software has to be balanced against the efficiency savings – for most smaller institutions that balance is close – for larger institutions the form processing is likely to win.
  • Again the forms need to be processed into the same database.

Keying in

There are many agencies that do this very cheaply, usually offshore. Again it needs to go into the same database which can perform the validation. This is not a major cost however and in-house operations have the merit of being faster into the overall database.

  • Given the current quality of data it is likely that there will be a fair amount of subsequent editing and in some cases the status of a graduate may change as they may require further contact. This again argues for an integrated system.
  • Again a web interface, similar to that used by those telephoning should be considered.

Coding

With the advent of assists for SOC and other coding these need to be incorporated into the system and made uniformly available to all methods.

DLHE January pre-survey preparation

Centrally-hosted online DLHE questionnaire

HESA offers a web-based DLHE questionnaire, which is centrally-hosted by HESA. If an institution wishes to present this method of taking part in the DLHE survey to its graduates, then it will need to have completed the registration exercise prior to the data capture period. Details about how to register are available at Centrally-hosted online DLHE survey - Guidance notes.

Postal mailing questionnaires and telephone scripts

Prior to each DLHE survey the HESA Institutional Liaison team will email all last known DLHE contacts with a set of questions about the size of their institution's DLHE target population and the mailing/telephone arrangements that they plan to use. Also, as part of this email, the Institutional Liaison team will ask for the name and address of two people at the institution to whom the DLHE questionnaires and telephone scripts should be addressed. This may or may not be the DLHE contact; someone else, e.g. a member of the Careers Service, may actually manage the DLHE survey, and so the consignment should be sent to them.

Not supplying responses to these questions will adversely affect the smooth running of the DLHE process. If an institution does not provide addressee details, for each survey, the distributor will either deliver to the address HESA provide (this will be of the last known DLHE contact as stored on the HESA system) or take the consignment back to the depot. Both situations can cause delays, which impact on the time institutions have to prepare for mailing. Also this poses unnecessary administrative burdens on the printers, on HESA and on institutions, in trying to trace a missing consignment and/or arrange for re-delivery.

It is important that contacts in institutions inform their colleagues, e.g. security staff (or anyone else who may be likely to be in receipt of the delivery) that delivery of questionnaires and telephone scripts is expected. Institutional Liaison will email DLHE contacts close to the delivery date to inform them between which dates delivery can be expected (this will usually be no longer than during a period of five working days). If boxes of questionnaires and telephone scripts are accurately addressed, and institutions expect the delivery, consignments should be received within this stated delivery period.

HESA therefore ask that institutions provide the name, job title, exact mail address and the telephone number of two recipients at the institution; one principal and one back up. The distributor will attempt delivery to the first recipient, and if unsuccesful, a second delivery attempt can then be made to the back up recipient.

If an institution's DLHE survey is administered by another institution/organisation, and the questionnaires and telephone scripts need to be delivered there, please provide the full mail address of this institution/organisation. In such cases the address label will include both a named 'care-of' contact and the address of the institution/organisation where the survey is administered and also the name of the institutional contact for reference. The back up contact details given should also be someone from the administering institution/organisation, so that a second attempt at delivery can be made.

The consignment will be clearly labelled - indicating the total number of boxes making up the delivery, and also the contents of each box, e.g. 1000 English questionnaires. It is important that an institution checks the consignment on delivery, as shortfalls cannot be rectified later.

HESA stock only a very small number of questionnaires and telephone scripts as contingency. This would be sufficient to provide to an institution in the event of a minor and unforeseen circumstance, should part of their own stock become unsuitable for mailing, e.g. if mailing equipment malfunctions and questionnaires are lost as a consequence. HESA does not store sufficient numbers to replace part of or an entire single institution's consignment. It is therefore imperative that institutions check the POPDLHE estimates provided by HESA and either confirm that these are correct, or provide accurate revised estimates. The figures provided are used by the printer to determine the final extent of the print run of questionnaires and telephone scripts for all institutions.

POPDLHE target list

DLHE record contacts will be able to register as 'read-only' users of their institution's Student Record data collection web page and will be notified by email each time the student return passes COMMIT checks and a POPDLHE list is generated. DLHE record contacts are strongly advised to liaise with colleagues responsible for submitting the Student return so that the final POPDLHE list can be checked before the Student Record closes, as there can be no changes to POPDLHE thereafter. The File Structure for the POPDLHE can be downloaded from the DLHE 2008/09 collection page.

DLHE January survey - census date of 11 January 2010

Use an Agency?

Most institutions mail out the survey in-house which accounts for a significant proportion of staff time in two concentrated periods during the year.

There are now commercial and sector-based agencies available that have extensive systems in place that will do all the DLHE work. They do so professionally and confidentially. However there is a lead time and it is necessary to be well organised if you are using an agency.

Specifically you need to:

  • Decide whether the agency is doing the whole end to end process or doing specific activities.
  • Have data on contact information in agreed formats (you have some say) at an agreed time.
  • Agree to interact with the agency using named personnel. A single point of contact is likely to be contacted to be told that a given area had a poor set of telephone data etc. The agency will not interact with your departments.
  • Be prepared to say stop once a given rate has been achieved: agencies can go on unnecessarily, especially if rewarded.
  • Take the output in an agreed format.
  • Where an agency is used it is also advisable for a DLHE officer at the institution to maintain a ‘quality assurance role’, especially where the agency is used for coding returns. One way to ensure quality is for random samples of the coded returns to be checked against the original returned DLHE survey form and any coding checked by the DLHE officer responsible for the HESA return at your institution.

Agencies seem to do at least as well as institutions in general but inevitably some control is relinquished.

Agencies can be used for some specific tasks only

  • Post out ( some or all)
  • Telephoning
  • Web
  • Form processing
  • Keying

Using an agency to post surveys does not have an effect on the response rate. Less clear is the effect of using an agency for telephoning, but the better agencies train their staff well and can develop a style that matches that of an in house operation.

Initial contact

In the period 16 November 2009 to 11 January 2010 the only acceptable method of data capture is the standard questionnaire and it should be completed by the graduate only. Institutions are required to make initial contact with its graduates in the January POPDLHE between 16 November 2009 and 27 November 2009. Institutions should not be undertaking any destinations surveying prior to this 'Initial contact' period.

The standard questionnaire is available in the following formats.

Printed version: DLHE record contacts are contacted in July and asked to confirm HESA’s estimate of their institution’s 2008/09 POPDLHE with a DATELEFT between 1 January 2009 and 31 July 2009. The paper questionnaire is available in an A3 flat sheet, or folded into A4 or A5. It has space for institutions to overprint names and addresses or attach labels. Paper copies of the questionnaire will be delivered to institutions during September 2009.

HTML version: An HTML version of the questionnaire is available for institutions to host on their own websites. The HTML version is available in English and Welsh and can be downloaded from the DLHE 2008/09 collection page. Institutions should not add any questions to or change the questionnaire in any way. Institutions are responsible for programming any ‘back-end’ or database structures that are required to support the use of this version of the questionnaire. Graduates should be directed to the web reference for this locally-hosted online questionnaire using the email or covering letter texts provided by HESA. Leavers should complete, date and return this version of the questionnaire on the institution’s web site.

Centrally-hosted online DLHE version: The centrally-hosted online DLHE questionnaire is available at www.dlhe.ac.uk. Graduates should be directed to this web-reference in the email or covering letter and, once completed, the graduate should follow the instructions to submit their questionnaire.

PDF version: A PDF version of the questionnaire is available in both English and Welsh and can be downloaded from the DLHE 2008/09 collection page. Institutions can email this version of the questionnaire to graduates for completion. Leavers should print the form in order to complete, sign, date and return it to their institution.

As there are many ways a leaver can complete and return a questionnaire, it is possible that an institution may receive more than one quesionnaire for the same individual. In this case the institution should return to HESA the first information it receives.

Initial contact schedule

During the first week of the 'Initial contact' period it is recommended institutions email a link to the centrally-hosted online questionnaire or their locally-hosted online questionnaire to those graduates for whom a valid and up to date email address is available. A postal questionnaire should then be sent to all those who did not complete and submit an online version, and to all those for whom an email address was not available. To allow as much time as possible for graduates to complete an online version, and therefore reduce the number of postal mailings, it is recommended the postal questionnaires be sent out towards the end of the second week. All graduates in the January POPDLHE must have been contacted by the end of the 'Initial contact' period.

If institutions are not offering either of the online versions, then postal mailing could take place at any time during the 'Initial contact' period.

If a leaver returns the questionnaire without completing one or more of the core questions they can be contacted by the institution in order to try and obtain the missing information and so ensure a valid return.

HESA encourages institutions to make use of the centrally-hosted online questionnaire, and it hopes over time use of this version will increase.

Covering letters / emails

HESA has produced the text of the covering letters and emails that should accompany all versions of the questionnaire. They are available in both English and Welsh. HESA also provides instructions on how to use these texts and institutions should refer to this guidance. The letter and email texts are available in both English and Welsh. The covering letter text should be printed onto institutions' own letter headed stationery and this should be sent with all postal questionnaires. The text for email contact should be used for sending a link to either the centrally-hosted version or a locally-hosted version of the questionnaire. All letter and email texts with instructions for their use can be downloaded from the DLHE 2008/09 collection page.

The text of the letters and emails should NOT be changed apart from where it is indicated either in italics or where there is an instruction. Institutions should particularly note the instruction to insert their own data protection collection notice (See Data Protection and Collection Notices section below).

Institutions can add to the introductory text in order to address particular groups of students. For example, for students who have continued to study at the institution the following text may be used:

  • We are asking everyone, even those who have continued to study at the institution, what they will be doing on 11 January 2010, so that the information is comparable.

When sending out postal questionnaires institutions should mail out the questionnaire, letter, and, if they use them, a reply-paid envelope. In order to offset some of the additional costs that are incurred in implementing the survey, institutions can, if they wish, find sponsorship for the survey. Statutory users and their auditors are also content that institutions should be able to include other items in the survey mailing, for example, leaflets about institutions’ graduate services. It is acceptable for institutions to include other surveys in with the DLHE questionnaire. However in deciding what might be reasonable to include in the mailing, institutions will need to be conscious of the requirement to obtain the best possible response to the survey and to meet the response rate targets.

Similarly, the text for the email should be sent with a web reference to either the centrally-hosted online questionnaire or a locally-hosted version of the questionnaire. Institutions can include web references, e.g. to their own graduate services, or to other surveys, again bearing in mind the requirement to obtain the best possible response to the DLHE survey.

Direct contact with the leaver between 16 November 2009 and 11 January 2010

If the institution has direct contact with the leaver between 16 November 2009 and 11 January 2010, e.g. they visit the careers office, the leaver can be handed a standard questionnaire to complete whilst they are there. A copy of the covering letter must be handed out with the questionnaire.

If an institution's graduation ceremony falls during this period then graduates can be handed a questionnaire at graduation. Between 16 November 2009 and 11 January 2010 the standard questionnaire along with a copy of the covering letter must be used.

Postcard reminder in place of second mailing

Consider using a postcard as a reminder method in place of the second mailing. If you only use one mailing and then move to the telephone it may prove cost-effective to send a postcard to the graduate reminding them to complete the DLHE survey, whilst also providing the web reference for the online survey.

  • Postcards to the permanent address of the graduate may be read by the graduates’ families who could influence the graduate to complete the survey. The postcard can be effective in reaching those graduates you would not necessarily contact through the main postal method. During the trials for the National Student Survey it was discovered that a postcard sent to the permanent home address prompted the family of graduates to get in touch and update contact details or to act as a forwarding service for the original survey.
  • The postcard can be designed with your institution's logo and typeface etc. to be instantly recognisable by the graduate.
  • Keep the wording on the postcard to a minimum. It should include a prompt for the graduate to complete the postal survey, a link to an online version (if appropriate), and an email address and contact telephone number of the office dealing with the DLHE survey.
  • When using the postcard as a reminder method for the first time you might want to consider sending the postcard to a random sample of 50% of non-responders and use the second mailing, or one of the other methods of follow-up contact for the other 50%. The results of the returns from this can then be monitored to assess which method is more effective with your graduates.
  • Your department may experience an increase in telephone queries from the parents or family of graduates immediately following the posting of the postcard. It may be beneficial to have one dedicated email address that graduates and their representatives can contact during this time to allow communications to be more effectively managed.

Follow-up contact

Follow-up contact can be made between 11 January 2010 and 12 March 2010. Emailing a web reference or sending out a postal questionnaire for a second time is optional, as institutions may find other methods generate a better response, e.g. institutions may find that the practice of one postal mailing together with telephone follow-up is the best way for them to meet the response rate targets. If an institution intends to conduct a second postal mailing then it will have needed to inform HESA of its intention to do so at the pre-survey preparation stage of the survey. Again, the texts for covering letters and emails for follow-up contact are available in English and Welsh. Possible alternative follow-up methods are:

  • Send reminder postcards (which have been designed and printed locally to reflect the institution’s own branding).
  • Send an SMS text message to graduates to remind them (if the institution believes that this is appropriate).
  • Email graduates with a reminder.

Each time a questionnaire is sent, either by post or electronically, it must be accompanied by the the information contained in the covering letter or email.

Direct contact with the leaver between 11 January 2010 and 12 March 2010

If an institution has direct contact with the leaver between 11 January 2010 and 12 March 2010, e.g. they visit the careers office, the leaver can be interviewed using the telephone script or handed the printed version of the questionnaire to complete whilst they are there. A copy of the covering letter must be handed out with the questionnaire.

If an institution's graduation ceremony takes place between 11 January 2010 and 12 March 2010 then it can interview graduates using the telephone script, or hand out a standard questionnaire. Institutions must convey the information contained in the covering letter prior to any interview using the telephone script, or hand out copies of the covering letter with any printed standard questionnaire.

Telephone survey follow-up

Any telephone follow-up must be conducted during the period 11 January 2010 and 12 March 2010. As institutions are required to undertake initial contact using the standard questionnaire, it is not possible to only conduct a telephone survey, which features a reduced set of questions.

Copies of the telephone script together with postal questionnaires are delivered to institutions during September 2009 and so institutions should inform HESA (as part of the pre-survey preparation) of their intention to conduct telephone follow-up. If an institution finds it is short of telephone scripts, photocopying of the DLHE telephone script is permissable with the consent of the copyright owner (HESA), provided the forms are used for DLHE purposes only.

Where a telephone call is made the caller needs to explain by way of introduction that:

  • They are ringing on behalf of the institution to find out whether the former student has found employment and/or further study following completion of their course.
  • Information is used both to advise current students about opportunities and also to feed into a national statistical survey conducted each year to see what happens to students upon leaving higher education.
  • The information on this form will be used by your institution and coded information will be sent to the Higher Education Statistics Agency. Further details and contact information are supplied as part of the covering letter.
  • They may be contacted again in the future as part of a follow-up survey. This survey will be conducted by a third party and so their details may be passed on to this third party.
  • They need to find out what the former student was doing on 11 January 2010.
  • .

Employing current students to undertake the telephoning

Institutions may wish to employ their own current students to undertake the telephoning as it establishes a link between present and former students and this may encourage participation in the telephone survey. Some institutions have reported using native speakers (for example Greek students to telephone Greek graduates) to help with non-UK calls.

Where a telephone call is made, obtaining the response directly from the leaver is desirable; if contact is made with someone other than the leaver, this is acceptable, provided that the contact is sufficiently well informed to be able to answer the core questions, which are indicated by a ring around the number on the telephone script. It is not so much the source of information that is important as the quality of the information itself. However, care must be taken when obtaining information from such third parties (see Data Protection and Collection Notices section below).

In determining whether information is robust enough for inclusion in the 2008/09 DLHE return, the contact must be able to:

  • Supply all the relevant information (i.e. answers to the core questions ringed on the telephone script) AND
  • Must be confident that it relates to the leaver’s position on 11 January 2010.

Where information for completion of the core questions on the telephone script comes from a source other than the leaver or a contact at the leaver’s home, then additional audit proof is required to show that the individual conducting the survey has collected or confirmed their source of data after 11 January 2010. For example, a confirmatory signature against the date that each individual student’s details were confirmed, since a standard questionnaire completed by the leaver is the only acceptable method of data capture prior to 11 January 2010.

Survey accessibility

Graduates with visual impairments or other disabilities that may restrict them from completing the paper questionnaire or an online version can complete the survey by way of telephone interview, or by using the PDF version of the questionnaire. The telephone interviewer can use the questionnaire instead of the telephone script to enable the graduate to answer all the questions, and not just the reduced set of questions on the telephone script. Alternatively, a graduate can print the PDF version of the questionnaire as a large print version or in a way that suits their requirements in order to complete, sign, date and return it to the institution. The PDF version of the questionnaire can be downloaded from the DLHE 2008/09 collection page.

Additional/sponsored questions

Institutions’ own or sponsored questions can be used with the telephone script but institutions will need to be conscious of the requirement to obtain the best possible response to the survey and to meet the response rate targets. The sponsored questions should perhaps be asked at the end of the telephone call, after institutions have ensured they have obtained sufficient information (at least all of the core questions answered) to provide a valid DLHE return.

Other informed source

Information obtained from other informed sources, including academic departments or employers, is also acceptable as a method of data capture. However the contact must be able to:

  • Supply all the relevant information (i.e. answers to the core questions ringed on the telephone script) AND
  • Must be confident that it relates to the leaver’s position on 11 January 2010.

The individual conducting the survey must be able to provide additional audit proof to show that they have collected or confirmed their source data after 11 January 2010. For example, a confirmatory signature against the date that each individual student’s details were confirmed, since a standard questionnaire completed by the leaver is the only acceptable method of data capture prior to 11 January 2010.

In the case of medical graduates only, if an institution has attempted to contact a graduate during the 'Initial contact' period, and has attempted to contact the graduate again, e.g. by telephone, but has had no response from either method, then the institution can use information obtained from the Medical School in order to complete a DLHE record. Note that the data held by the Medical School must reflect the position of the graduate as at 11 January 2010. Medical graduates whose data is completed by using information obtained from the Medical School should be coded 7 'Other' in Field 4 Method of study and 3 'Not in study' in Field 6 Study (relating to Q2). Institutions should ensure that they have a clear audit trail for the information recorded.

Note that the core questions require that the contact will know what the leaver is doing with respect to both employment and further study on 11 January 2010.

Explicit refusals

An explicit refusal is where a leaver either sends back the questionnaire marking it as a refusal, emails, or writes a letter including a statement that they do not wish to be included in the survey. It can result from a telephone conversation where the leaver verbally states that they do not wish to be included in the survey. A leaver who does not send back the questionnaire and/or does not submit an electronic version and/or is un-contactable by telephone should not have a DLHE record returned to HESA, and is not regarded as having explicitly refused. Leavers with DLHE records identified as METHOD = 9 ‘Reply received explicitly refusing to provide information’ will be counted towards an institution’s response rate.

Longitudinal follow-up

An explicit refusal at the early DLHE stage automatically means the graduate will not be included in the sample selection for the relevant longitudinal follow-up. Institutions should however establish a central record for any graduate who indicates in Section F of the DLHE questionnaire that they do not wish to be contacted in the future as part of a follow-up survey. Also as a graduate can contact the institution at any point between the early DLHE and the longitudinal follow-up three years later to indicate they do not want to be further involved in DLHE, this record should be accessible to a number of institutional colleagues in Alumni, Careers Service etc., as there will be more than one institutional point that a graduate may contact . This information will then be readily available for institutions to refer to when the sample selection is drawn, and these graduates can be excluded.

Improving and maintaining a good response rate

Institutions are reminded of the target response rates for the DLHE survey, namely:

80% for UK-domiciled (i.e. home) leavers who previously studied full-time;
70% for UK-domiciled leavers who studied part-time;
50% for all other EU students;
80% for Research Council funded students.

All institutions are expected to meet, or exceed, these thresholds for the 2008/09 survey. The funding bodies have indicated that they are very concerned that some institutions are consistently falling significantly below this requirement.

Monitoring response rates

Each institution faces different challenges when trying to meet the HESA response rate. Every cohort of graduates is different and the methodology may have to be fine-tuned at your institution in order to achieve the best possible response to the survey. Monitoring response rates throughout the fieldwork period and to each type of response (post, electronic, telephone etc.) can help in deciding how to proceed with the following fieldwork period and may help in attaining a better response rate. By monitoring response carefully, any change to the response rate can be investigated and remedial action taken in a timely manner to mitigate any drop in response rate. If response rates have declined or the HESA target has not been met institutions should investigate what steps can be taken to rectify this prior to the end of the fieldwork period, for example, by additional phone contact. Following the fieldwork period some reflection of the DLHE process should take place, with weaknesses assessed and rectified before the next fieldwork period. If the return is closed as soon as the HESA target has been met but the population has not been exhausted consider keeping the fieldwork open. A high response rate will be a benefit to your institution in the long term; for example a high response rate will see more data available on the TQI website which will be viewed by prospective students.

 

Contact details

One of the most effective ways of increasing your response rate is to ensure the contact details you have for graduates are up to date and accurate.

  • Updating contact details of graduates in their final term will be an effective way of increasing the response to the DLHE. This may not be a task for the DLHE manager but for the institution's central administration. However the request for action may have to come from the DLHE manager and in some instances the Alumni Office.
  • Before the first mailing, if contact details are not maintained centrally you could ask individual departments to check the contact details and update them where necessary, including any known changes to email addresses and mobile telephone numbers.

Promotion of DLHE

  • Promotional material for the DLHE could be prominently displayed around the institution in areas used by final year students to raise awareness of the survey and show results of previous surveys for the students.
  • Maintaining contact with the graduate once they have left the institution through mailouts from the Careers Service can also result in graduate contact details remaining up to date. Some institutions write to graduates a few months after graduation reminding them of the benefits of contacting the Careers Service and alerting them to the DLHE and the importance of returning it.
  • The Careers Service in institutions can also extend their promotional activities by emailing graduates to remind them of their services and at the same time asking for any change of contact details to be mailed back to their alumni.
  • Some institutions also have staff working at graduation ceremonies who distribute information about the DLHE survey, raising awareness among graduates and guests that the survey will be sent to their home address. Staff have also reported that this is a good opportunity to remind graduates that they can still contact the university career service for advice.

Sharing good practice

Maintaining good communication within the whole of the institution is very helpful in obtaining a good response rate. Particularly important is the maintenance of up to date contact details which are often held in departments rather than by the central administration.

  • Where contact details are not held centrally or where the departments have supplementary records, the DLHE survey manager should consider requesting that each department and the Alumni Office, where appropriate, checks the DLHE sample before the field work period commences.
  • Retaining email addresses following graduation allows quick and cost effective communication with graduates to be maintained. In the case of the DLHE, an email from the Careers Service alerting the graduate to the survey can also serve to remind the graduate of the services provided by the institution in the months following graduation.
  • Sharing the results of the DLHE survey with colleagues from around the institution will help to reinforce the importance of the information provided by the graduates. This in turn may lead to individual departments' commitment to collecting updated contact details during the students’ final term or semester.
  • Sharing experiences with colleagues from other institutions will enable good practice to be shared. There may also be scope for sharing the costs of outsourcing the postal or telephone survey.

Debriefing

Once the field work period has closed and the return made to HESA allow some time for the DLHE team to reflect on the process.

  • Analyse the data; is one faculty achieving a lower response rate than others? Is there a reason for this?
  • How efficient was the postal survey; is there anything you or your staff would like to see changed?
  • How did the telephone survey work? Has anything changed since the last DLHE? Are fewer graduates available on land lines for example? Is there any feedback the student telephonists would like to provide?
  • Is it time to change part of your collection methodology, for example using the postcard reminder? How are you going to prepare for this change?
  • How did coding using the CASCOT system work for your institution?
  • Is there anything you need to feed back to HESA for wider consideration?
  • The DLHE results can be used within your institution for quality enhancement purposes; for example, which graduates are not getting graduate level jobs, how does this compare with your competitors?
  • Follow-up interviews should be considered with those graduates who have provided surprising results.
  • Can the DLHE data be used alongside the National Student Survey Data and your own internal surveys?

Audit trail, record keeping and monitoring

All data capture methods used must result in a robust audit trail. This will consist of one of the following:

Standard questionnaire (printed and PDF versions): evidence comprising the completed questionnaire, signed and dated by the leaver himself or herself.

Standard questionnaire (locally-hosted version): evidence demonstrating that the questionnaire was completed and dated by the leaver. This might for example mean that the institution’s system is set up in such a way that a read-only copy of the data keyed by the leaver is retained.

Standard questionnaire (centrally-hosted version): institutions should keep a copy of the files downloaded from the HESA archive.

Telephone survey: evidence comprising a completed telephone script, which was completed between 11 January 2010 and 12 March 2010. Where information for completion of the core questions on the telephone script comes from a source other than the leaver or a contact at the leaver’s home, then additional audit proof is required to show that the individual conducting the survey has collected or confirmed their source data after 11 January 2010. For example, a confirmatory signature against the date that each individual leaver’s details were confirmed, since a standard questionnaire completed by the leaver is the only acceptable method of data capture prior to 11 January 2010.

Other informed source: procedural evidence to demonstrate that the data

  • Answers the core questions ringed on the telephone script AND
  • Relates to the leaver’s position on 11 January 2010.

The individual conducting the survey must be able to provide additional audit proof to show that they have collected or confirmed their source data after 11 January 2010. For example, a confirmatory signature against the date that each individual leaver’s details were confirmed, since a standard questionnaire completed by the leaver is the only acceptable method of data capture prior to 11 January 2010.

Previous audits of FDS undertaken by HEFCE have not revealed any significant issues relating to institutions systems and practices in this area. Therefore, it is not intended that there be a regular programme of audits in the near future. However, funding councils retain the right to resume audit, or undertake one off audits should issues or concerns arise.

Database

At the heart of any operation such as this is a database that is effective. It is likely to be based on databases already in use but needs to support a standard query language and to be designed flexibly so as to cope as the DLHE evolves.

  • It needs to be accessible from all the types of entry and to have good status facilities so that users can quickly review the position of a graduate. Good summary facilities are also needed. However MS Access as the engine can be suited to the task provided the design is good. It may be worth collaborating here.
  • The system is a dynamic one and so it is important to take frequent archives with the possibility of roll back. A lot of very standard computer science applies and will be known by the technically competent within the institution administration.

Internal record keeping

Databases have been discussed above. However, it is worth noting the following:

  • It needs to be seen that records are well maintained for the whole process. For some this means maintaining paper records and keeping the original DLHE surveys, others have developed electronic methods of record maintenance including scanning completed forms.
  • The introduction of CASCOT has allowed institutions to code employment data faster and more consistently than before. Good practice in the use of CASCOT should be shared with colleagues and fed back to the HESA Institutional Liaison team.

Form readers

The DLHE form is machine-readable and has been designed to be read by any sensible OCR system (hardware and software).

  • With most common systems it will be necessary to cut the form in half but this can be done quite insensitively and the system should still work.
  • The volumes of forms are quite low for an agency who will have more powerful software that reads and corrects faster. Thus as a stand alone job it is unlikely to make sense but would be good for an agency doing the rest of the work.
  • Developing the software has to be balanced against the efficiency savings – for most smaller institutions that balance is close – for larger institutions the form processing is likely to win.
  • Again the forms need to be processed into the same database.

Keying in

There are many agencies that do this very cheaply, usually offshore. Again it needs to go into the same database which can perform the validation. This is not a major cost however and in-house operations have the merit of being faster into the overall database.

  • Given the current quality of data it is likely that there will be a fair amount of subsequent editing and in some cases the status of a graduate may change as they may require of a graduate may change as they may require further contact. This again argues for an integrated system.
  • Again a web interface, similar to that used by those telephoning should be considered.

Coding

With the advent of assists for SOC and other coding these need to be incorporated into the system and made uniformly available to all methods.

Data Protection

What to do before and during the DLHE surveys

Before the survey institutions should:

  • update each student's contact details
  • let all students know that the DLHE will be happening and give them an opportunity to withdraw from it, for example by providing the HESA student collection notice.

During the survey institutions should:

  • use accurate contact details
  • use only the contact details provided by the leaver (except where given by a third party, when the details should be used as described below)
  • take notice of any objections the leaver has to being contacted
  • either not collect, or delete, information from any leaver who does not wish their destinations data to be held by the institution.

When collecting data from a third party the interviewer should be aware that:

  • they should ask that the third party informs the data subject that data has been collected. The interviewer should also indicate that they can contact the institution for more information or with any concerns they might have
  • if the third party gives an interviewer a contact telephone number for the leaver, this may be used, providing the interviewer states where the number has come from and gives the leaver an opportunity to object to the call at the beginning of the conversation. The telephone number may only be recorded for future contact purposes outside of DLHE if the leaver gives their permission.

Objections to being contacted or providing data can be given at any time before the data is returned to HESA. Such objections must always be recorded.

Standard text, collection notices and informing students

In order for processing to be fair, data subjects should be informed about the uses made of data. A collection notice is a piece of text which fulfils this criteria.

Student collection notice

The HESA student collection notice should be made available to all students at each institution. This tells the students that:

  • they may be contacted for first stage DLHE
  • there is the possibility of follow up to the first stage DLHE
  • they have the opportunity to object to further contact.

DLHE questionnaire

There is a general statement on the questionnaire, referring to the covering letter for more information.

DLHE covering letter and email

The covering letter and email for the DLHE survey

  • tells the leaver that they will be contacted again if they don't reply
  • informs the leaver that data may be collected from a third party if they can't be contacted themselves
  • gives the leaver an opportunity to refuse to give data or be contacted again
  • tells them that they may be contacted for the longitudinal survey and gives them the opportunity to object.

DLHE collection notice provided by HESA

This is included at the bottom of the covering letter and email, and describes the uses made of the data by HESA and its Statutory Customers.

DLHE collection notice to be written by institutions

Space has been allowed within the covering letter for each institution to include their own collection notice text about the use they make of the data. HESA strongly recommends that each institution composes suitable wording for, and includes its own collection notice in the covering letter, in order to protect the institution’s legal position.

Further information about informing students

Institutions cannot guarantee leavers read the covering letter and collection notices, but this does not necessarily cause a problem. The Data Protection Act 1998 says that information concerning what happens to personal data must be made available to the individuals concerned. Organisations must make every reasonable effort to provide this, but not so that it is disproportionate to the purposes for which the data is collected. Therefore, if institutions follow the above procedures, there should be no further need for concern.

Issues associated with the collection of data from third parties

The two main issues associated with collecting data from third parties are ensuring the data is accurate, and that leavers are informed of what happens to their data.

The accuracy principle is not contravened because:

  • steps are taken to ensure the data are accurate for the purposes, e.g. validation and audit
  • the DLHE collection allows a record to be marked as containing data obtained from a third party.

So that the collection of the data is fair, institutions should follow the procedures above and use the standard collection notice text.

HESA wrote to the Information Commissioner's Office describing the position. The IC's office replied with two recommendations: to list the statutory bodies in receipt of the data on the collection notices, and to allow leavers to refuse to participate in the DLHE by replying in writing. Copies of this correspondence can be obtained on request from the Data Protection Manager (data.protection@hesa.ac.uk).

Keeping DLHE data

The data should be kept only as long as is necessary. If the purpose is research then data may be kept for a long time. The completed questionnaires need not be kept beyond the time that the possibility of an audit might be carried out. Institutions should therefore keep either a hardcopy or electronic version of the questionnaire or telephone script for each individual leaver for one year after the data is returned to HESA. There is no need to anonymise the data. However, the data should not be used in a way that will affect the individual concerned.

Further information about data protection issues

Students can obtain further information on data protection issues from the HESA website at www.hesa.ac.uk/dataprot. The document 'Data Protection Guidance for the HESA Records' can be obtained from this page. For further information please contact the Data Protection Manager at data.protection@hesa.ac.uk.

Who to contact

If you have any queries about DLHE methodology, please contact the Institutional Liaison team at HESA (liaison@hesa.ac.uk).