
2010/11 2009/10 2008/09 2007/08 2006/07 2005/06 2004/05 2003/04 2002/03
The low participation measure used in Tables T1, T2 and T3b is based on a UK wide classification of areas into participation bands. From 2011/12 it uses the new POLAR3 methodology which is based on a similar method to POLAR2 but uses more up to date information. As these two methods are not strictly comparable, the 2009/10 to 2011/12 indicators have been produced using both POLAR2 and POLAR3 to provide time series information. More information on the POLAR3 methodology can be found in the definitions document.
The relatively high (in UK terms) participation rate in Scotland coupled with the very high proportion of HE that occurs in FE colleges means that the figures for Scottish institutions could, when viewed in isolation, misrepresent their contribution to widening participation. Therefore, low participation data has not been produced for institutions in Scotland from 2007/08 (applicable to main tables T1, T2, T3b and supplementary tables SP6, SP7) and for Scottish domiciled students (applicable to supplementary table SP1).
The Scottish Funding Council (SFC) produce their own indicators relating to young full-time Scottish domiciled undergraduate entrants, showing proportions from the most deprived datazones and also from social classes NS-SEC 4-7. These measures are produced and published independently of ‘Performance Indicators in HE in the UK’. The Performance Indicators Steering Group bears no responsibility for the SFC measures but has recognised that they may provide some contextual information for interested readers. The measures are available from the SFC website.
In 2009/10 the reporting arrangements for certain students taught as part of Lifelong Learning Networks (LLNs) changed. This change meant that students were no longer reported by the lead institution but were instead reported by the registering institution. Where the registering institution was an HEI, the number of students reported as transferred for the lead institutions will be inflated. The effect was significant for Birkbeck College and the figures in table T3d were suppressed in 2010/11, as a result, the figures in table T4b have been suppressed in 2011/12 (applicable to T4b).
The data for The University of Sheffield relating to non-continuation of mature full-time other undergraduate entrants in 2009/10 were distorted by a particular group of students who opt to undertake additional work experience before returning to the institution for completion of a professionally accredited award. This had an impact on the non-continuation data used to produce table T3d in the 2010/11 publication, as a result, their data have been excluded from table T4b in the 2011/12 publication (applicable to table T4b).
Figures stated for University of the Highlands and Islands were higher than actual figures in T3 2010/11 due to data coding errors, this has an impact on table T4 for 2011/12 (applicable to tables T4).
The non-continuation following year of entry data from London South Bank University have been suppressed as the University was unable to record activity of students on a number of courses. This had an impact on the non-continuation data used to produce table T3, T4 and Table T5 (applicable to tables T3, T4 and T5).
The data for Birkbeck relating to projected outcomes in Table T5 have been suppressed in 2011/12 as the provision is relatively new and hence there are insufficient students in each year to inform a robust projection (applicable to table T5).
Leeds College of Art transferred to the HE sector in 2011-12, there is currently insufficient data on the HESA record to inform transitions and therefore data in T5 have been suppressed in 2011/12 (applicable to table T5).
The low participation measure used in Tables T1, T2 and T3b is based on a UK wide classification of areas into participation bands. The relatively high (in UK terms) participation rate in Scotland coupled with the very high proportion of HE that occurs in FE colleges means that the figures for Scottish institutions could, when viewed in isolation, misrepresent their contribution to widening participation. Low participation data has therefore not been produced for institutions in Scotland (applicable to main tables T1, T2, T3b and supplementary tables SP6, SP7) and for students Scottish domiciled (applicable to supplementary table SP1).
In 2009/10 the reporting arrangements for certain students taught as part of Lifelong Learning Networks (LLNs) changed. This change meant that students were no longer reported by the lead institution but were instead reported by the registering institution. Where the registering institution was an HEI, the number of students reported as transferred for the lead institutions will be inflated. Where the registering institution was an FEC, the number of students reported as being no longer in HE for the lead institution will be inflated. Where the effect is significant the affected figures have been suppressed (applicable to T3, T4). The following institutions were leads of affected LLNs:
The data for The University of Sheffield relating to non-continuation of mature full-time other undergraduate entrants in 2008/09 and 2009/10 were distorted by a particular group of students who opt to undertake additional work experience before returning to the institution for completion of a professionally accredited award. This had an impact on the non-continuation data used to produce table T3d in the 2009/10 and 2010/11 publication, as a result, their data have been excluded from table T3d and T4b in the 2010/11 publication (applicable to table T3d and T4b).
Mis-coding of a group of students by Glasgow Caledonian University has had a negative impact on their projected outcome figures in table T5. The proportion of entrants shown as projected to obtain a first degree is known to be inaccurate and understated, and the proportion projected to neither gain award nor transfer has been inflated. The University requests that users contact the University’s Director of Policy and Planning for information on completion rates (applicable to table T5).
The non-continuation following year of entry data from London South Bank University have been suppressed as the University was unable to record activity of students on a number of courses. This had an impact on the non-continuation data used to produce table T3, T4 and Table T5 (applicable to tables T3, T4 and T5).
Figures stated for University of the Highlands and Islands are higher than actual figures due to data coding errors (applicable to tables T3 and T5).
The following elements of QR funding for England have been excluded as they are not calculated by subject: business research element; funding for national research libraries. The QR elements that have been excluded total £68.9 million. QR funding figures reflect the retrospective reductions to research grant of 1.7 per cent announced in March 2011. There are some minor rounding errors for two late grant adjustments implemented in June 2012 (applicable to table R1).
QR funding figures for Northern Ireland exclude £5.0 million for additional research degree programme supervision funding and sustainable research funding that is not assigned (applicable to table R1).
Data have been suppressed as the low response rates to the destinations of leavers survey mean that the data may not be comparable with other institutions (applicable to table series E1).
The low participation measure used in Tables T1, T2 and T3b is based on a UK wide classification of areas into participation bands. The relatively high (in UK terms) participation rate in Scotland coupled with the very high proportion of HE that occurs in FE colleges means that the figures for Scottish institutions could, when viewed in isolation, misrepresent their contribution to widening participation. Low participation data has therefore not been produced for institutions in Scotland (applicable to main tables T1, T2, T3b and supplementary tables SP6, SP7) and for students Scottish domiciled (applicable to supplementary table SP1).
For the academic year 2008/09, UCAS changed the question that informs NS-SEC for the majority of applicants. The question reverted back to the original wording for 2009/10. For applicants up to and including the 2007/08 academic year and for the 2009/10 academic year, UCAS asked:
"If you are under 21, please give the occupation of your parent, step-parent or guardian who earns the most. If he or she is retired or unemployed, give their most recent occupation. If you are 21 or over, please give your own occupation."
For applicants for 2008/09 entry, the question changed to:
"If you are in full-time education, please state the occupation of the highest-earning family member of the household in which you live. If he or she is retired or unemployed, give their most recent occupation. If you are not in full-time education, please state just your own occupation."
The change in question between 2007/08 and 2008/09 has had an impact on the NS-SEC indicators, causing the proportion of students classified as ‘unknown’ and those classified as falling into NS-SEC groups 4 to 7 to rise. Given these differences and the lack of any significant external changes to the system, it is safe to conclude that the change in question means that the NS-SEC data for 2008/09 is not comparable with that published previously. As a result, the 2008/09 NS-SEC data was been published separately in tables T1ai, T1bi and T1ci and labelled as age-adjusted NS-SEC.
Although the question reverted back in 2009/10, there may still be a slight impact on the NS-SEC indicators resulting from applicants who applied using the 2008/09 form, but deferred entry until 2009/10. However, the 2009/10 will be more comparable with that published up until 2007/08 than with the 2008/09 data. Therefore, NS-SEC time series data published within the summary excludes data for 2008/09.
In 2009/10 the reporting arrangements for certain students taught as part of Lifelong Learning Networks (LLNs) changed. This change meant that students were no longer reported by the lead institution but were instead reported by the registering institution. Where the registering institution was an HEI, the number of students reported as transferred for the lead institutions will be inflated. Where the registering institution was an FEC, the number of students reported as being no longer in HE for the lead institution will be inflated. Where the effect is significant the affected figures have been suppressed (applicable to tables T3, T5). The following institutions were leads of affected LLNs:
The full-time other undergraduate non-continuation following year of entry data have been suppressed from the University of Northampton as the University was unable to record activity of students at partner colleges for a small number of courses. This had an impact on the non-continuation data used to produce table T3d in the 2008/09 publication, as a result, their data have been excluded from table T4b in the 2009/10 publication (applicable to table T4b).
Teesside University’s 2007/08 entry cohort included students in FE colleges who were studying programmes through the Regional Lifelong Learning Network. From 2008/09 these students were countable by their originating institution, and hence treated as 'no longer in HE', so their inclusion in specific figures results in an inaccurate PI for the University. This had an impact on the non-continuation data used to produce table T3d in the 2008/09 publication, as a result, their data have been excluded from table T4b in the 2009/10 publication (applicable to table T4b).
The indicators for Manchester Metropolitan University have been suppressed as they included a number of students who transferred to an FE college. This had an impact on the non-continuation data used to produce table T3d in the 2008/09 publication, as a result, their data have been excluded from table T4b in the 2009/10 publication (applicable to table T4b).
The data for The University of Sheffield relating to non-continuation of mature full-time other undergraduate entrants in 2008/09 and mature full-time first degree entrants in 2007/08 were distorted by a particular group of students who opt to undertake additional work experience before returning to the institution for completion of a professionally accredited award. This had an impact on the non-continuation data used to produce table T3d in the 2009/10 publication and T3a and T3c in the 2008/09 publication, as a result, their data have been excluded from tables T3d and T4a in the 2009/10 publication (applicable to table T3d, T4a).
In 2009/10 the University of Cambridge adopted a new system of recording its part-time continuing education students. Students who declared from the outset that they did not intend to study for credit could be identified and excluded from the HESA Student record. The result is a decrease (3,815 to 1,115) in the institution's part-time undergraduate student numbers (applicable to tables T2b, T7).
Bangor University has identified an error in the data underlying table T6, which caused the proportion of modules with results to be overstated, and therefore the proportion of modules passed to be understated. The University requests that users contact the University's Assistant Registrar (Planning) for further information on module completion rates (applicable to table T6).
Mis-coding of a group of students by Glasgow Caledonian University has had a negative impact on their projected outcome figures in table T5. Data for Glasgow Caledonian University has therefore been excluded from this table (applicable to table T5).
Data have been suppressed as the low response rates to the destinations of leavers survey mean that the data may not be comparable with other institutions (applicable to table series E1).
In 2009/10, after applying the new funding model based on the outcomes of the RAE 2008, two institutions faced an unmanageable fall in funding and were provided with transitional funding to allow time to adapt to a reduction in resources. This transitional funding has been included and allocated to the units of assessment pro rata to the rest of the QR funding allocated to the institutions.
If you are under 21, please give the occupation of your parent, step-parent or guardian who earns the most. If he or she is retired or unemployed, give their most recent occupation. If you are 21 or over, please give your own occupation.
For applicants for 2008/09 entry, the question changed to:
If you are in full-time education, please state the occupation of the highest-earning family member of the household in which you live. If he or she is retired or unemployed, give their most recent occupation. If you are not in full-time education, please state just your own occupation.
The change in question between 2007/08 and 2008/09 has had an impact on the NS-SEC indicators, causing the proportion of students classified as ‘unknown’ and those classified as falling into NS-SEC groups 4 to 7 to rise. Given these differences and the lack of any significant external changes to the system, it is safe to conclude that the change in question means that the NS-SEC data for 2008/09 is not comparable with that published previously. As a result, the 2008/09 NS-SEC data has been published separately in tables T1ai, T1bi and T1ci and labelled as age-adjusted NS-SEC.
Please note that for 2009/10 UCAS applicants, the question will revert back to the original wording and it is expected that NS-SEC 2009/10 data will be comparable to that published up until 2007/08 (applicable to table series T1).
The low participation measure used in Tables T1, T2 and T3b is based on a UK wide classification of areas into participation bands. The relatively high (in UK terms) participation rate in Scotland coupled with the very high proportion of HE that occurs in FE colleges means that the figures for Scottish institutions could, when viewed in isolation, misrepresent their contribution to widening participation. Low participation data has therefore not been produced for institutions in Scotland (applicable to tables T1, T2, T3b).
In 2008/09 The Queen's University of Belfast misreported 280 part-time UK domicile students as non-European Union domicile (applicable to tables T2b, T7).
The full-time other undergraduate non-continuation following year of entry data have been suppressed from the University of Northampton as the University was unable to record activity of students at partner colleges for a small number of courses (applicable to table T3d).
Data for The Open University have been suppressed in the part-time figures because changes introduced by HESA to the method of apportioning FTEs between years have affected the reliability of this indicator for Open University students (applicable to table T7).
The creation, in August 2007, of the University of the West of Scotland (UWS) (as a result of a merger between The University of Paisley and Bell College) required the merging of data from two different student information systems. As a consequence the proportion of entrants shown as projected to obtain a first degree and the proportion projected to 'neither award nor transfer' in table T5 is known to be inaccurate (applicable to table T5). This has also had an impact on the non-continuation data used to produce table T3 for UWS in the 2007/08 publication, as a result, data for UWS have been excluded from table T4 in the 2008/09 publication (applicable to table T4).
Data for Aston University have been suppressed as the majority of the students in this category were either returned in error in 2006/07 or are now being reported by a different HEI due to changes in the funding arrangements for those students (applicable to table T4b).
The data for University of Northampton have been suppressed as the high number of mature students with no formal qualification aim has adversely affected the figures (applicable to table T4b).
Teesside University’s 2007/08 entry cohort included students in FE colleges who were studying programmes through the Regional Lifelong Learning Network. From 2008/9 these students were countable by their originating institution, and hence treated as 'no longer in HE', so their inclusion in specific figures results in an inaccurate PI for the University (applicable to tables T3d and T5).
Bangor University has identified an error in the data underlying table T6. The proportions of modules with results and modules passed are higher than those shown in T6. The University requests that users contact the University's Assistant Registrar (Planning) for information on module completion rates (applicable to table T6).
The indicators for Manchester Metropolitan University have been suppressed as they included a number of students who transferred to an FE college (applicable to table T3d).
The data for The University of Sheffield relating to non continuation of mature full-time first degree entrants in 2007/08 (and those with a previous HE qualification) are distorted by a particular group of students who opt to undertake additional work experience before returning to the institution for completion of a professionally accredited award (applicable to tables T3a and T3c).
Data for Rose Bruford College have been suppressed due to concerns over the representativeness of the leavers included in the indicator (applicable to tables E1a-E1d).
Due to a data error Manchester Metropolitan University did not return any PhDs awarded during 2008/09 therefore this data has been excluded from the Research indicators (applicable to table R1).
The list of institutions in the 2004/05 Performance Indicators has changed.
Trinity College of Music has merged with Laban to become Trinity Laban
University of Wales College of Medicine has merged with Cardiff University
The following institutions have changed their names in the HESA products for 2004/05:
Anglia Polytechnic University changed to Anglia Ruskin University
Bath Spa University College changed to Bath Spa University
Bolton Institute of HE changed to The University of Bolton
Canterbury Christ Church College changed to Canterbury Christ Church University
University College Chester changed to University of Chester
University College Chichester changed to University of Chichester
Falmouth School of Art and Design changed to University College Falmouth
Liverpool Hope University College changed to Liverpool Hope University
University College Northampton changed to The University of Northampton
Southampton Institute changed to Southampton Solent University
University College Winchester changed to The University of Winchester
University College Worcester changed to University of Worcester
University of London is a confederal organisation. The colleges of the university, shown separately in the HESA reference volumes, are:
Birkbeck College
Courtauld Institute of Art
Institute of Education
Goldsmiths College
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine
King’s College London
London Business School
London School of Economics and Political Science
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
The School of Oriental and African Studies
The School of Pharmacy
Queen Mary and Westfield College
Royal Academy of Music
Royal Holloway and Bedford New College
The Royal Veterinary College
St. George’s Hospital Medical School
University College London
(Heythrop College is also a college of University of London, but is not included in HESA statistics, as it is not publicly-funded.)
In addition, the institutes within the umbrella of University of London (Institutes and activities) are:
University of London Institute in Paris
University Marine Biological Station, Millport
School of Advanced Study comprises:
Institute of Advanced Legal Studies
Institute of Classical Studies
Institute of Commonwealth Studies
Institute of English Studies
Institute of Germanic and Romance Studies
Institute of Historical Research
Institute for the Study of the Americas
Warburg Institute
The list of institutions in the 2003/04 Performance Indicators has changed.
Press: Call 01242 211120 or email pressoffice@hesa.ac.uk.
General enquiries should be sent to piteam@hesa.ac.uk.
Enquiries regarding the Performance Indicators Steering Group (PISG)
should be directed to the HEFCE Press Office on 0117 931 7363