Widening participation summary: UK Performance Indicators 2018/19
Changes to definitions mean that the latest UKPI data differs from previous years' data. Expand this box for more information.
From 2017, the UK Performance Indicators population was extended to include Alternative Providers and the methodology was enhanced to cater for students who have less traditional start dates. HESA initially published indicators based on the enhanced methodology and with extended coverage as Experimental UK Performance Indicators. Users of the data were invited to provide feedback on the revised methodology. Following the feedback received and in consultation with key stakeholders, this methodology was adopted as the standard from 2020 and the experimental label was removed. Please note that the only indicators which have not been adapted to an extended population or with enhanced methodology are the projected outcomes (table T5) as further consultation is required. For further details please see the changes page.
The purpose of the indicators is to provide an objective measure of how the UK higher education (HE) sector is performing.
Two key areas are covered, with the first of these being widening participation. This is the focus of this summary, which explores the proportion of entrants from disadvantaged backgrounds or in receipt of Disabled Students’ Allowance (DSA). Future publications this year will look at student retention, UK domiciled undergraduate entrants to publicly funded UK HE providers and Alternative Providers.
We examine two potential measures of background, namely the state school marker and the POLAR4 low participation indicator.
Table series T1 provides the proportion of young entrants to each UK HE provider and Alternative provider that are from state schools or colleges.
The three tables in T1 split the population by whether they are on a first degree or other undergraduate course, as well as providing the overall young full-time undergraduate entrant picture.
In Table A below, we provide a time-series which documents how the percentage of young full-time first degree entrants from state schools or colleges has changed over time across the four nations. Chart 1 illustrates the pattern in the UK overall, whilst Chart 2 demonstrates how the proportion varies within the HE sector plotting each provider's indicator and benchmark.
Additional information on how the state school marker is generated is provided at the end of this publication.
Table series T1 and T2 include data on students from low participation neighbourhoods covering both young and mature entrants on full-time and part-time undergraduate courses.
The definition of a low participation neighbourhood in 2018/19 is based on POLAR4, it has been run back to 2015/16 for comparison purposes.
Table B shows how the proportion of this group of students has evolved in the various UK countries. Low participation data is not produced for HE providers in Scotland and are not included in these tables and charts. The table can be filtered by age, mode and level of study.
Chart 3 supplies the time-series data for different cohorts of entrants in the UK overall. Chart 4 displays the disparities in the percentages from such groups across HE providers and shows their benchmark plotted alongside their indicator.
Among young full-time first degree entrants, the percentages from low participation neighbourhoods according to the POLAR4 method has steadily risen over time across the UK.
With regards to part-time undergraduate entrants, a clear discrepancy is seen in the proportion from low participation neighbourhoods by age, with higher percentages reported for young students.
Chart 4 - Percentage of UK domiciled young full-time first degree entrants who did not leave within 50 days of commencement from low participation neighbourhoods (using POLAR4) by HE provider and academic year
Academic years 2014/15 to 2018/19
Here, we define a disabled student as one in receipt of DSA. Table T7 provides a breakdown by HE provider and Table C below gives sector level time trends for the proportion of DSA students for each country by mode of study.
Are figures for the proportion of student entrants from state schools or colleges comparable over time?
Our figures do not factor in changes that may have occurred to the underlying population (e.g. how the percentage of secondary school pupils attending state schools or colleges has evolved in the UK over time).
Secondly, there has been a change in the way the state school marker is created. For new entrants from 2014/15, the last provider attended field we collect (PREVINST) must contain a valid UK Provider Reference Number (the unique identifier allocated to each provider) or a valid generic code (see coding manual for further details), rather than historic UCAS, department and HESA school codes.
These have been mapped to school type and grouped to form the state school marker. In the case of an unknown or invalid PREVINST code, students have been excluded from the formation of the indicator. This alteration may have an impact on the quality of the school type data.
For these reasons, caution must be exercised when analysing the time series data.
Who classifies as a young entrant?
Young entrants are those aged under 21, whilst mature students are those aged 21 or over on 30 September of the academic year in which the student is recorded as commencing their studies.
How do you define a state school or college?
This covers all schools and colleges (including further education colleges and publicly funded HE providers) that are not classed as independent.
Why is the state school marker so high for Northern Ireland?
In Northern Ireland, all schools are categorised as state in the lookup file used to produce the widening participation indicators. Although there are fee paying schools, the schools also receive some state funding.
What is the POLAR methodology?
The POLAR classification places local areas into five quintiles, based on the higher education participation rates of 18 year olds in the locality. Those with the lowest percentages are placed into quintile 1 and are considered to be the most disadvantaged, with quintile 5 having the highest rates.
An individual is deemed to be from a low participation neighbourhood if their area falls into quintile 1.
Please note that the various ways in which low participation neighbourhoods have been defined over the years are not comparable and hence analysing time trends should be done using the same classification method.
The POLAR4 method was introduced in the Experimental Statistics: UK Performance Indicators release and has become the standard method for 2018/19 data onwards.
The NI Multiple Deprivation Measure and other NI geographical indicators are based on Crown Copyright and are reproduced with the permission of Land & Property Services under delegated authority from the Keeper of Public Records, © Crown copyright and database right 2020 NIMA MOU577.4
Why is there no data for the proportion of entrants from low participation neighbourhoods in Scotland?
The relatively high (in UK terms) participation rate in Scotland coupled with the very high proportion of HE that occurs in further education colleges means that the figures for Scottish HE providers could, when viewed in isolation, misrepresent their contribution to widening participation. Therefore, low participation data has not been produced for HE providers in Scotland. More information is provided in the data intelligence notes.
How are The Open University (OU) students dealt with?
Prior to 2014/15, all OU entrants were considered to be in England, where the university has its administrative centre. However, since 2014/15, entrants have been allocated to the country where their national centre is located.
DSA data for the OU has been excluded for the academic years 2007/08 and 2008/09, due to changes introduced by HESA to the method of apportioning full-time equivalent between years which has affected the count of OU part-time students. In 2014/15, the OU under-reported the number of students in receipt of DSA in England and Wales. From 2017/18, the OU are included in benchmarks and totals.
See data intelligence notes for further details.
Where can I find information on any merger or changes to HE providers?
These can be found in the mergers and changes section.
Are there any additional notes on the UK Performance Indicators to accompany this publication?
For more information relating to the UK Performance Indicators, please see the data intelligence notes.
What changes have occurred to DSA?
Changes to the Disabled Students' Allowance administered through Student Finance England took effect in the academic years 2015/16 and 2016/17. These changes rebalanced responsibility for supporting disabled students, with HE providers providing certain aspects of disability related support previously funded via the DSAs, including funding to support specialist equipment and accommodation costs. Further details have been published on the changes to DSA. As a result of these changes, the Performance Indicator reported in Table T7 - Participation of UK domiciled students in higher education who are in receipt of Disabled Students' Allowance for the 2016/17 cohort - is not consistent with previous years.
UK Performance Indicators pages
- Widening participation tables
- Widening participation summary
- Non-continuation tables
- Non-continuation summary
- Employment of leavers
- Publications archive
- Higher Education Student Data
Support and contacts
- About the UKPIs
- Data intelligence
- Pre-release access to official statistics
- Sign up for HESA Open data alerts
+44 (0) 1242 211 120, [email protected]
+44 (0) 1242 211 494, [email protected]