Introduction to check documentation
Version 1.0 Produced 2015-06-25
A COMMIT transaction will generate check documentation reports containing management information that Higher education providers (HEPs) will need to review to assess data quality.
Check documentation takes the form of an Excel workbook containing a series of tables which present much of the returned data to enable HEPs to ensure that their submission represents their HEP as expected. In part, check documentation provides a preview of some of the onward uses of the data. Therefore review of the check documentation should be undertaken by providers to verify the submitted data.
Colleagues within HEPs are in an excellent position to recognise more detailed anomalies within their data, using local knowledge of the intricacies of their own HEPs, and are strongly encouraged to closely scrutinise the check documentation reports. The check documentation is also used by HESA to conduct data analysis and quality assurance of a data submission. Queries raised on these items form the basis of any data quality queries fed back to HEPs through the Minerva data quality database.
This guide details each of the items in turn, providing details of the fields used in their creation along with guidance on interpreting the item and tips detailing common issues. Note that this guide is not exhaustive and HEPs are advised to extensively review the check documentation for their own purposes.
Where HEPs have returned data by campus, using Provision.INSTCAMP, check documentation comparison sheets will be produced for each Provision.INSTCAMP as well as for the HEP as a whole.
What to do if you find issues within your check documentation:
Where anomalies are found you should record them on any relevant Minerva queries raised by HESA and set the queries to be fixed on resubmission. The HEP should then contact [email protected] to request that the data is de-committed in order that the necessary amendments can be made and the data resubmitted.
Check documentation - Comparisons sheet
Those items contained within the Check documentation comparisons sheet are deemed to be critical by HESA. These items detail the number of offshore students for the HEP in the reporting year and their locations. For both these tabulations a comparison is made with the data reported in the previous reporting year. Any issues found within these tables should be treated as a priority.
ITEM 1 - Number of offshore students by Level and Type (Derived from Provision.LEVEL, Provision.TYPE)
The groupings used for Level are:
| Level (Provision.LEVEL) | ||
| D | Research doctorates | PG |
| E | Taught doctorates | |
| L | Research masters | |
| M | Taught masters | |
| H | Bachelors degrees with honours | FD |
| I | Ordinary bachelors degrees | |
| J | HE diplomas | OUG |
| C | HE certificates | |
| F | Further education | FE |
PRIORITY: CRITICAL
This item displays a HEP's offshore student numbers by type and level of provision. Student numbers are used extensively. Aggregate offshore data informs Transnational Education (TNE) enquiries handled by the HESA Information services team and this data is also included in heidi - the Higher Education Information Database for Institutions.
DESCRIPTION: This item details offshore student numbers by type and level of provision. Figures are provided for both the current and previous reporting year to provide a comparison along with percentage and total number differences between 2013/14 and 2014/15.
WHAT TO LOOK OUT FOR: Check that the numbers are as expected. All variations of greater than 10% should be checked. All differences of this magnitude should be addressed and/or explained as necessary. It is recognised that HEPs' offshore provision may develop and change between years. Where this is the reason for significant changes between years, HEPs should provide brief details through the Minerva data quality database.
TIPS:
- Small student number changes can shift percentages significantly
- Check for similar spread of type of provision compared to previous year. Significant shifts may indicate a change of coding of Provision.TYPE between years for the same provision. This should either be corrected or explained.
ITEM 2 - Number of offshore students broken down by Type and Geographic Region (Derived from Provision.TYPE, Provision.COUNTRY)
PRIORITY: CRITICAL
This item displays an HEP's offshore student numbers by geographical region. There is considerable interest in where offshore provision is taking place, both from statutory customers and official bodies and in data enquiries handled by the HESA Information Services team.
DESCRIPTION:This item details offshore student numbers by geographical region. Figures are provided for both the current and previous reporting year to provide a comparison along with percentage and total number differences between 2013/14 and 2014/15.WHAT TO LOOK OUT FOR:Check that the numbers are as expected. All variations of greater than should be checked. All differences of this magnitude should be addressed and/or explained as necessary. It is recognised that HEPs' offshore provision may develop and change between years. Where this is the reason for significant changes between years, HEPs should provide brief details through the Minerva data quality database.
TIPS:
- Small student number changes can shift percentages significantly
- Check for similar geographical spread of provision compared to previous year. Significant shifts may indicate the possible omission of a group of students from the return.
- Tabulations in check documentation are by geographical region. Detailed feedback on numbers returned by individual Provision.COUNTRY codes are reported in the Frequency Counts.
Need help?
Contact Liaison by email or on +44 (0)1242 388 531.