Staff 2016/17: Support guides
This page provides an overview of the 2016/17 Staff collection (C16025).
This should be used alongside the C16025 coding manual, which provides more detailed, technical information about the collection.
We collect data across a number of streams. These streams focus on different aspects of higher education.
The Staff stream collects data about staff employed in the UK at a higher education provider. Details of which staff need to be returned to us are included in the Coverage document found in the Coding manual.
The data we collect on behalf of the sector is provided to governments and funding bodies in order to support the regulation of higher education. We also make anonymised data available to the public to enhance understanding of UK higher education and to support its advancement.
Our coding manuals provide you with all the necessary documentation to support your data return. The coding manual contains technical documents giving detailed information on the record's coverage, data specification and submission formats. Familiarising yourself with these documents will help you make an accurate and timely return.
Each collection has its own coding manual which can be found in the Data collection section of our site. By default, you will land on the open collection for each record; you can then select previous or future years.
The coding manuals will be updated throughout the data collection cycle and Record Contacts informed by email when new versions are made live. Be sure to check the manual's Revision history for a summary of changes.
|August 2016 to March 2017||HE providers' local preparation|
|Early March 2017||Validate data locally using validation kit|
|July 2017||Preparation guide released|
|August 2017||Full data collection system opens|
|30 September 2017||Return date|
|16 October 2017||Commit date|
|16 October 2017 to 10 November 2017||Data quality checking period|
|10 November 2017||Last submission|
|14 November 2017||Sign-off|
You submit data via our online data collection system. To access this, you will need to have an appropriate role in our Identity System (IDS). We publish an IDS user guide which includes information on creating and editing your account.
You will need to be given access to the data collection system by the relevant record contact at your provider.
Once you have access to the system you will be able to upload files, track the progress of your submission, view data quality issues and download reports. An overview of the submission and validation process is given below. Further details are provided in the Coding manual under the 'Submission process and quality assurance' section heading.
The coding manual homepage includes all the technical information you require, including:
- The data specification
- File format specifications
- A detailed collection schedule
- Our XML data entry tool (available for some streams)
- Quality rules.
This Support guides page collects together the following resources:
- Preparation guide
- Stream user guide
- Data collection system: Known issues and release history.
In the Contact and support area of our site, you can find:
- User guides for our Identity System (IDS) and Minerva Data Quality database (HESA subcribers only).
- Support with using XML files
- Our XML amalgamator tool and Validation kits available for some collections.
Our Data innovation section includes information about:
- Open and recently completed record reviews, including information about changes we are implementing
- Our Data Futures programme which will transform the higher education information landscape.
In the About us section, you can find:
Key changes for the C16025 2016/17 Staff record
A document summarising the changes that have been made to the Staff record for 2016/17 can be found in the C16025 coding manual. A full list of the changes can be found in the Revision History. Any changes made to the 2016/17 Staff record after the first release of the manual will also be documented here, so you should frequently reference this web page.
Updates to user interface and submission processes
Our data collection system has been upgraded for this year to show the progress of your file in meeting key deadlines.
In addition, we now operate a tolerance approach for switch requests whereby the quality rule will not be switched entirely, but instead for an agreed maximum number of counts. This request should still be raised in the usual way by emailing [email protected] with an explanation as to why the rule is not applicable. HESA will then seek approval from the relevant Funding Council to switch this rule within a specified tolerance. If this tolerance is exceeded it will re-trigger as an error and you should get back in touch to seek approval to increase this tolerance.
Accessing the data collection system
The Staff record contact for each provider will have access to the data collection system and through IDS will be able to invite additional colleagues to also have access to the system to submit data and view reports. Further information can be found in the IDS User Guide.
For the C16025 Staff record, we have adopted an agile approach to data collection. Functional components of the system are being released incrementally during the period leading up to full functionality being released by early August. This approach gives you more flexibility in when data can be submitted. This in turn provides a longer window for data quality checks to be made.
Details of the contents of each release can be accessed via the Release history.
Validation rules previously known as Business and Exception have now been collectively rebranded to be quality rules. There is a new quality rules webpage accessed via this page. This single webpage presents all the data quality validation in one place, rather than the rules appearing on each page for individual data items. This ensures greater visibility of the portfolio of rules, easier searching as well as a downloadable spreadsheet of rules.
HESA Amal tool
For the C16025 collection you need to submit a single file containing full data. Each subsequent file you upload will replace the previous one. If you prepare your data in multiple *.xml files, our XML amalgamator tool will combine these records prior to submission.
Guidance from Statutory Customers
HEFCE would like to remind providers about the importance of meeting the published collection schedule. HEFCE will review providers' performance as part of the annual provider review process.
Data collection system: Release history and known issues
|Issue Summary||Status||Date raised||Date resolved|
Issue ID: 46488 - Credibility Report - SAL4
Average figures are being incorrectly calculated for UCEA Level 2 for last years (15/16) data only. Correct figures are available from Liaison if required.
As the collection is due to close on the 14th November, this issue will not be fixed within the current collection.
|Open||07 November 2017|
Issue ID: 44204 - QR.C16025.Contract.LEVELS.3
This quality rule error is triggering correctly but displaying the incorrect information.
The instances that are triggering this rule can be found within the LVL1 Credibility Report that is available. To do this please use the 'Total' drilldown option and sort by the 'Levels' column.
|Closed||21 September 2017||28 September 2017|
Issue ID: 43444 - Credibility Reports
The populations in the following reports incorrectly includes starters who began after 1 August 2015, not starters who began after 1 August 2016: PREV3, PREV4, ACTL2, ATQ2, ETH2, HQHD2, LOCL2, NAT3 & PREV2.
|Closed||4 September 2017||5 September 2017|
For info only: Credibility Reports
Shading rules on credibility reports do not appear until your submission has finished processing. The reports and tables will appear first and the shading rules later. So whilst you're transaction is processing, please wait until it has completely finished before checking if you have triggered any shading rules.
|For info only||31 August 2017|
Issue ID: 35249 - Credibility Report Download to Excel
When downloading credibility reports to excel there is an issue with sub-headings (Part-time, Full-time, Total) not being pulled through.
The following tables with this issue are: ETH4, SAL1, SAL2, SAL3, SAL4, SOBS1, MOE2, HCC1.
|Closed||25 August 2017||14 September 2017|
Issue ID: 41530 - Credibility Reports
To use the drill down functionality on the credibility reports please always go into the chapters by clicking on the 'view' button; you can then use the blue triangles to view the figures. If this method is not followed then you will experience issues with this information displaying.
|For info only||09 August 2017|
Issue ID: 41484 - QR.C16025.Activity.CCENTRE.5
A number of providers are experiencing an issue where this rule is triggering despite knowingly recording cost centres from last year.
Currently all cost centres are being recognised as 'New' despite being returned in previous years, as data from C15025 has not been pulled through correctly into the current collection.
|Closed||09 August 2017||10 August 2017|
|Release ID||Release date||Release Summary|
|45||13 July 2017||
This is the first release of the data collection system.
The C16025 Staff record collection includes drill down functionality on the following credibility reports: AGE1, AGE2, ATQ1, ATQ2, ATQ3, HCC1, HCC2, LVL1, MOE3, SAL1, SAL4 & SALG1
In addition, a concept of 'tolerances' has been incorporated to quality rules.
Stages of data submission
A. Sending data
Send data by clicking on the 'send data' button in the data collection system. Note that actions not currently available will be greyed out.
Browse your computer to locate the file you wish to submit, and upload the file to the data collection system.
- Files can have any name
- Files must be in XML and conform to the relevant XML Schema Definition (XSD) file
- Files can be compressed using PKZip/WinZip which will significantly reduce the upload time
- Only a single file can be held on the system.
Automated validation checks (quality rules) will now run.
Further details on the quality rules which apply to this collection can be found in the coding manual.
The Quality rules report will contain the details of any rules triggered by the submission. Make any necessary amendments to the data and resubmit the file to the system. To pass validation, the file must not trigger any validation errors.
You can run some of these validation checks through our validation kit before submitting data to the data collection system. The kit enables you to test your data locally against schema and business stage validation rules prior to submission. You are strongly encouraged to use the validation kit as part of your data preparations.
Remember that you need to process and pass the business-stage validation in order to meet the requirements of the return deadline.
To proceed to the next stage in the submission process, a valid file needs to have been submitted. The data will then be classed as 'committable' and the option to process a COMMIT transaction will be made available through the data collection system.
Prior to committing data, you should review all of the reports produced on the data collection system and make any necessary corrections to the data.
The COMMIT transaction sends a copy of your submission to our data quality assurance team and, where appropriate, to the relevant funding council. We analyse your return in parallel with your own analysis.
A passed commit transaction will lock the system to prevent the data from being amended. This is to allow our data quality assurance team to analyse the submission. To unlock the system you will need to request a DECOMMIT transaction.
Remember that you need to process and pass a COMMIT transaction in order to meet the requirements of the commit deadline.
Once your data has passed all the stages of validation, and any issues highlighted during credibility checking have been addressed, we will set the return to CREDIBLE. This produces the sign-off form.
When data is set to credible, a link to the sign-off form is automatically emailed to the head of the submitting organisation as well as the appropriate record contact. The form should be completed and signed by the head of the reporting organisation and returned to us by email or post. This verification offers both you and us assurances regarding onward use of the data.
Sign-off completes the data collection process.